Search  
Tuesday, January 06, 2009 ..:: Discussion Forum ::.. Register  Login
      
 TRUE Discussion Forum
SearchForum Home
     
  Discussions  Ask the Ref Doctor  "The"...
 "The" punch...should it have scored?
 
 6/12/2006 3:07:42 PM
User is offlinevoorheestkd
16 posts
www.voorheestkd.com
5th


"The" punch...should it have scored?

Master Harris;

I bring a situation to you, not only for your insight, but for the discussion of the group.

Hong is backing Chung into a corner, unleashes a flurry, Chung is back-pedaling, end result is Chung flies out of the ring, falling over, and it is obvious that the "final straw" technique was a punch to the hogu by Hong, as Hong is standing there, solid front-stance, arm and fist still extended as Chung flies out of the ring.

To score, or not to score?  AND, should an 8-count be assessed to Chung (with the resultant possibility of the bonus point)?

Yes, based on actual match.  Thank you for your input, Master Harris, and assorted sirs and ma'ams.

--Larry Voorhees

Des Moines, Iowa

 6/12/2006 4:34:21 PM
User is offlinebckwh
104 posts
2nd


Re: "The" punch...should it have scored?
Mr. Voorhees, thank you for sharing an action match situation with our Forum. Since you are looking for discussion of this situation, I will reserve my comments until later in the week, allowing others a chance to chime in with their comments.
~BHarris
 6/12/2006 7:07:26 PM
User is offlineMichael Soper
33 posts
4th




Re: "The" punch...should it have scored?

In that case, I will offer what I can to this scenario...

If Chung was knocked out of bounds by a legal technique (the hand strike with the closed fist) to a legal scoring area of the body (the chest) then the technique should count as a valid point.  I would only hesitate to score based on the fact that Chung was already headed in that direction and the impact of the punch may or may not have led to exiting the ring, it may have only been headed in the same direction as the player was moving in the first place.

Now, whether or not to issue a standing 8 count?  If the technique scored and it was the sole reason for the player being knocked down, then it should be issued.  However, it is possible the slippery flooring outside the competition area caused the fall.  In that case, it could count as a valid score but not necessarily warrant a standing 8 count.

One idea I would like to bring up is if the point did not score, would it have been acceptable for the center referee to issue a Jouiee or Kyong-Go to Chung for going out of bounds?

 6/12/2006 8:52:40 PM
User is offlinebckwh
104 posts
2nd


Re: "The" punch...should it have scored?
Mr. Soper, thank you for your contribution to the Forum regarding this subject. Any others have comments...?
~BHarris
 6/13/2006 4:41:46 AM
User is offlineJeannette
176 posts
2nd


Re: "The" punch...should it have scored?
I agree with Mike on his first two paragraphs.

When you say the point did not score, are you saying that it was, instead, a push? In that case then hong would be penalized or warned for his push and chung would get off free. If, instead, you are saying that it was, in the referee's opinion, a punch, but the judges didn't see or score it, then I think chung would be subject to penalization for leaving the ring. In my opinion, a referee's decision to penalize should be independant of what the corner's do or do not do.
 6/13/2006 6:10:02 AM
User is offlinebckwh
104 posts
2nd


Re: "The" punch...should it have scored?
Ms Woodard, thank you for your insightful comments as well. How about some other comments...
~BHarris
 6/16/2006 9:36:16 PM
User is offlineJoe
25 posts
4th


Re: "The" punch...should it have scored?
Assuming that we are using an electronic scoring system this is the way this is the way I see the situation. If the appropriate numbers of judges see it the way you do and press their button and the system registers the buttons for the score in the allotted time window, then it is a score, if, not then it is not a score. If from the center’s perspective he sees the same I’d expect a count and a bonus point awarded. Then a Joo-eui or Kyung-go would be issued to Chung. If not, a Joo-eui or Kyung-go would be issued to Hong for pushing or a Kyung-go would be issued to Chung to for crossing the boundary voluntarily.
 6/19/2006 9:35:49 PM
User is offlinebckwh
104 posts
2nd


Re: "The" punch...should it have scored?
Mr. Aguon, thank you for your comments regarding this punching situation. Is there anyone who has a different way of handling this situation than the ones already presented? I will allow a little more time for others to submit their comments.
~BHarris
 7/2/2006 6:11:02 PM
User is offlineMichael Soper
33 posts
4th




Re: "The" punch...should it have scored?

Doctor, after nearly two weeks of silence on this topic I doubt any other members have something else to add. Would you please enlighten our discussion with a prescription for this punch/push and should it have scored/been penalized along with any other details for handling the situation? And if anyone else does have something to add, please add your opinion to our discussion too; this really is the best way to learn from referees across the country without having to worry about starting the next match immediately, equipment-checking the latest division, the ominous crowds, or the passionate parents. Can you tell I'm preparing for Atlanta?

 7/7/2006 11:23:38 AM
User is offlinebckwh
104 posts
2nd


Re: "The" punch...should it have scored?
 Modified By bckwh  on 7/7/2006 10:32:32 AM)
Mr. Soper et al, let us review the punch vs push situation. In this situation, a lot of the answer is based on personal perception on the part of the Referee and of the Judges. As has been stated many times, it is the job (solely) of each Judge to decide whether a techniqe meets the criteria for awarding a point (Power, Accuracy, Target Location, Proper Implement). So, in this case, a Judge should score what they see based on those criteria. If the punch was a proper punch with the appropriate implement to the appropriate scoring area, and with sufficient power, a point should be awarded. Factors that a Judge might consider would be the position of the competitor being punched, plus the result of the punch.

The Referee (solely) is responsible for determining if the action was the result of a legal attack, one free of a violation preceding the punch, and/or free of a violation following the punch. Also, the Referee should consider whether the attack was a valid punch attack or a punch. If the Referee determines that the attack was a push and not a legal punch, the Referee must wave off a point that scored (if any) and award a kyungo for the push. If the Referee determines that the attack was a legal punch, then no action should be taken against the competitor who attacked with the punch. Additionally, the competitor who crossed the Boundary Line may receive either a verbal warning (at the very least), or a kyungo. Judges should be aware that the preferred technique for awarding a point for a punch is the "Cover Punch" technique. That does not mean that a point can not be awarded for a solid punch that buckles an opponent while meeting the other criteria for a valid point. Still, it is a consideration that, should points become plentiful for all punches, the beauty of Taekwondo (with its dynamic kicks) may be diluted and become more of a punching sport and less of a kicking sport. That balance is entrusted to us in our role as Judge when we decide whether to award points for punches.

Should a punch result in a knockdown, the Referee must decide if the competitor knocked down is in need of an 8-count for recovery. Not every action that results in a knockdown should result in an 8-count. This is a misconception held by many of us as officials. The 8-count is there for safety purposes, in order to allow a competitor who has received a severe blow and who becomes temporarily incapable of properly defending themselves. Referees should be careful not to award an 8-count, and thus, a Bonus Point every time a competitor is knocked down as the result of a kick or punch. Remember that is there for the safety of the competitor. Of course, when a Referee feels that the 8-count is warranted for safety reasons, it should be given, not just because a competitor was knocked down from a valid attack.

~BHarris
  Discussions  Ask the Ref Doctor  "The"...

SearchSearch  Forum HomeForum Home     

Copyright 2005-2008 by CBSolutions.com   Terms Of Use  Privacy Statement